Literatuur

Zo. Hieronder dan vol (gepaste) trots mijn geraadpleegde literatuur tot nu toe. Een groot deel heb ik gebruikt voor mijn curriculumanalyse en mijn herontwerp. Een deel was ter lering ende vermaeck. Een deel had ik al gebruikt voor mijn visiestuk van LA1. En de inhoud van mijn visiestuk heb ik meegenomen in mijn herontwerp. Het spijt me voor alle bomen die gesneuveld zijn, maar ik lees fijner van papier dan van beeldscherm….

Literatuurlijst

Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009302

Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education, 15(1), 101-11.

Brigati, J. R., & Swann, J. M. (2015). Facilitating improvements in laboratory report writing skills with less grading: A laboratory report peer-review process. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 16(1), 61-68. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v16i1.884

Chiu, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2014; 2013). Supporting knowledge integration in chemistry with a visualization-enhanced inquiry unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 37-58. doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9449-5

Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409-426. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004

Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. W. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 891-901. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891

Crompton, H., Burke, D., Gregory, K. H., & Gräbe, C. (2016). The use of mobile learning in science: A systematic review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 149-160. doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9597-x

DAS. (2013). In Thomas M. (Ed.), Bachelor of applied science: Een competentiegerichte profielbeschrijving. (1.0th ed.) Stichting Domein Applied Science.

de Bie, D. (2002). Competenties, wat zijn dat en wat doen we ermee? Tijdschrift Voor Medisch Onderwijs, 21(4), 161-166. doi:10.1007/BF03056564

de Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105-134. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0

Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331.

Evans, D. J. R., & Cuffe, T. (2009). Near-peer teaching in anatomy: An approach for deeper learning. Anatomical Sciences Education, 2(5), 227-233. doi:10.1002/ase.110

Fallows, S., & Chandramohan, B. (2001). Multiple approaches to assessment: Reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 229-246. doi:10.1080/13562510120045212

Faye Marsha G Camahalan, & Ruley, A. G. (2014). Blended learning and teaching writing: A teacher action research project. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 15, 1.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487

hbo-raad. (2015). #hbo 2025: Wendbaar & weerbaar. ().

Horstmanshof, L., & Brownie, S. (2013). A scaffolded approach to discussion board use for formative assessment of academic writing skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 1-13. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.604121

Johnstone, K. M., Ashbaugh, H., & Warfield, T. D. (2002). Effects of repeated practice and contextual-writing experiences on college students’ writing skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 305-315. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.305

Jones, M. L. B., & Seybold, P. G. (2016). Combining chemical information literacy, communication skills, career preparation, ethics, and peer review in a team-taught chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(3), 439-443. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00416

Kao, G. Y. (2013). Enhancing the quality of peer review by reducing student “free riding”: Peer assessment with positive interdependence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 112-124. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01278.x

Kat-de Jong, M. (z.j.). Taalbeleid ATGM. ().Avans Hogeschool.

Kellogg, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(2), 355-365. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.2.355

Kellogg, R. T., & Raulerson, B. A. (2007). Improving the writing skills of college students. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 237-242. doi:10.3758/BF03194058

Kellogg, R. T., & Whiteford, A. P. (2009). Training advanced writing skills: The case for deliberate practice. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 250. doi:10.1080/00461520903213600

Kremers, I. (2014). Opleidingskader academie voor de technologie van gezondheid en milieu. Breda: Avans Hogeschool.

Kwan, K., & Leung, R. W. (1996). Tutor versus peer group assessment of student performance in a simulation training exercise. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 205-214. doi:10.1080/0260293960210301

Leer- en Innovatiecentrum Avans Hogeschool. (2014). Ondewijsvisie avans hogeschool: Samen het maximale uit jezelf halen. ().Avans Hogeschool.

Motschnig-Pitrik, R., & Standl, B. (2013). Person-centered technology enhanced learning: Dimensions of added value. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 401. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.013

Mulder, R. A., Pearce, J. M., & Baik, C. (2014). Peer review in higher education: Student perceptions before and after participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(2), 157-171. doi:10.1177/1469787414527391

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090

Nulty, D. D. (2011). Peer and self-assessment in the first year of university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(5), 493-507. doi:10.1080/02602930903540983

Pearce, J., Mulder, R., & Baik, C. (2009). Involving students in peer review. Case Studies and Practical Strategies for University Teaching, CSHE, 

Phillips, K. E. S., & Grose-Fifer, J. (2011). A performance enhanced interactive learning workshop model as a supplement for organic chemistry instruction. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(3), 90-98.

Ramorola, M. Z. (2013). Challenge of effective technology integration into teaching and learning. Africa Education Review, 10(4), 654-670. doi:10.1080/18146627.2013.853559

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education Routledge.

Rubin, R. S. (2006). The academic journal review process as a framework for student developmental peer feedback. Journal of Management Education, 30(2), 378-398. doi:10.1177/1052562905277185

Sambell, K., & McDowell, L. (1998). The value of self and peer assessment to the developing lifelong learner. Improving Student learning–improving Students as Learners, , 56-66.

Schuwirth, L. W. T., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2011). Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Medical Teacher, 33(6), 478-485. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.565828

Sluijsmans, D., Dochy, F., & Moerkerke, G. (1998). Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer- and co-assessment. Learning Environments Research, 1(3), 293-319. doi:10.1023/A:1009932704458

So, L., & Lee, C. H. (2013). A case study on the effects of an L2 writing instructional model for blended learning in higher education. TOJET : The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4)

Steffens, K., Bannan, B., Dalgarno, B., Bartolomé, A. R., Esteve-González, V., & Cela-Ranilla, J. (2015). Recent developments in technology-enhanced learning: A critical assessment. RUSC: Revista De Universidad y Sociedad Del Conocimiento, 12(2), 73-86. doi:10.7238/rusc.v12i2.2453

Ten Cate, O., & Durning, S. (2007). Peer teaching in medical education: Twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Medical Teacher, 29(6), 591-599.

Tilstra, L. (2001). Using journal articles to teach writing skills for laboratory reports in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(6), 762.

Tom, M. (2015). Five C framework: A student-centered approach for teaching programming courses to students with diverse disciplinary background. Journal of Learning Design, 8(1), 21-37.

Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20-27. doi:10.1080/00405840802577569

Topping, K. J. (2010). Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 339-343. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003

Trauth-Nare, A., & Buck, G. (2011). Assessment FOR learning. The Science Teacher, 78(1), 34.

Valcke, M. (2010). Onderwijskunde als ontwerpwetenschap: Een inleiding voor ontwikkelaars van instructie en voor toekomstige leerkrachten / martin valcke (4e, herwerkte versie ed.). Gent: Academia Press.

van den Akker, J., Fasoglio, D., & Mulder, H. (2010). A curriculum perspective on plurilingual education Council of Europe.

van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 341-356. doi:10.1080/03075070600680836

Van Keer, H. (2004). Fostering reading comprehension in fifth grade by explicit instruction in reading strategies and peer tutoring. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 37-70.

Walker, J. P., & Sampson, V. (2013). Argument-driven inquiry: Using the laboratory to improve undergraduates’ science writing skills through meaningful science writing, peer-review and revision. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(10), 1269.

Geef een reactie

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *